Β
Record: 4β8
O/U Record: 6β6
Current Streak: 3 Straight Unders
Last 7 Games: 2β5
DMVI: +6
Confidence Index: 33%
Current Game: @ Buffalo Bills (+6 / 54)
Next Game: vs Baltimore Ravens
Cincinnati is a high-volatility C-type team, dealing with inconsistency, defensive leaks, and a market that has lost faith in them. C-teams can provide value when the public completely abandons them β but you must pick your spots carefully.
Right now, the Bengals are struggling to meet expectations and are priced accordingly.
This shows a team the market is pricing too optimistically, despite poor execution:
When a C-team is overvalued, thatβs a red flag.
Bottom-tier confidence rating.
This confirms bettors shouldnβt expect stability β volatility rules.
No strong buy/sell signal. The market isnβt bullish or bearish β itβs undecided because Cincinnati hasnβt shown consistent direction.
CIN vs A-type teams on the road (off opponent SU win):
No sample β No specific edge.
When ANY C-type team is a road dog vs an A-team off a win:
Translation:
C-teams struggle badly in this role.
This aligns perfectly with Cincinnatiβs profile.
The Bengals have a mountain to climb anytime they step up in class.
Allowed 39 points. Not a team built to lay chalk.
Competitive but not reliable.
PF: 15 | PA: 30.33
Their defense collapses as road favorites.
A bit more competitive here, but scoring dips.
This is a team where role matters β Cincinnati performs best when:
β catching 3.5 to 6.5 points
β playing non-division opponents
β in games where the scoring pace is moderate
| Span | PF | PA | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 3 | 21.33 | 24.67 | Slightly competitive |
| Last 5 | 28.8 | 32 | Shootout tendencies |
| Last 7 | 27.86 | 31.14 | Defense leaking heavily |
| Last 10 | 23.2 | 33.1 | Bottom-tier defense |
| Last 15 | 23.33 | 31.17 | Long-term instability |
The Bengalsβ defensive issues arenβt temporary β theyβre structural.
These are the angles your ATS Stats members drool over:
As a 3.5 to 6.5 road underdog, last 4 years.
Road team vs non-division opponent after allowing 14β21 points last game.
When a 10+ point road dog in December.
Road team off division game facing AFC opponent.
These systems reveal where Cincinnati actually has value:
β‘ As a mid-range road underdog
β‘ In December unders when priced as large dogs
β‘ When the market overreacts to a semi-competitive defensive showing
Cincinnatiβs 2025 season shows:
Their biggest issue?
Their worst games come against strong defenses and structured offenses.
Buffalo is a brutal matchup for this profile.
Value Rating: β β βββ (Low, but selective value exists)
Best markets:
β ATS as mid-range road underdog (3.5β6.5)
β Team Total Unders in tough defensive matchups
β Full game Unders in December when catching double digits
Risk Level: High
C-teams require discipline when betting them β you never chase momentum with Cincinnati.
| Category | Grade | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Market Grade | C | Volatile, inconsistent |
| Cycle Strength | D | No strong trend |
| DMVI | Cβ | Overvalued |
| Situational Edges | C | Very dependent on matchup |
| PVIβSOS Strength | D | Poor vs strong teams |
| Betting Value | C+ | Selective underdog value |
Cincinnati is not a team you back long-term.
Their value exists only in specific ATS roles β otherwise avoid tying bankroll to volatility.
Β
β ATS STATS β Team Grading Report San Francisco 49ers ($S.F.) β Market Grade:…
β ATS STATS β Team Grading Report Boston Bruins ($BOS) β Market Grade: B…
β ATS STATS β Team Grading Report Baltimore Ravens ($BAL) β Market Grade: B…
β ATS STATS β Team Grading Report Houston Rockets ($HOU) β Market Grade: A…
Get ready for eight races on the dirt track at Aqueduct! We've distilled our picks…
This betting analysis uses the proprietary Raymond Report Computer Forecast. The Value Index (V.I.) is…