⭐ ATS STATS – Team Grading Report
Detroit Red Wings ($DET) — Market Grade: B | Market Sentiment: NEUTRAL (2 Days)
🏒 Team Overview
Record: 24–19–0
O/U Record: 20–21–2
Current Streak: 2 SU Losses
Last 7 Games: 4–3
DMVI: +130.5
Confidence Index: 57%
Market Sentiment: NEUTRAL (2 Days)
Current Game: vs Ottawa Senators (+125 / 6)
Next Game: vs Vancouver
Detroit is sitting in a classic B-grade transition zone — productive, competitive, but not fully trusted by the market. Results say “capable,” pricing says “wait and see.”
Translation:
$DET isn’t broken — but it’s not being chased either.
📊 Market Value Index (DMVI + Confidence)
DMVI: +130.5
This is a notable market discrepancy:
• Detroit has outperformed expectations relative to pricing
• Results haven’t fully translated into market respect
• Value exists — but volatility remains
This is a misalignment zone, not a momentum trade.
Confidence Index: 57%
Confidence reflects inconsistency:
• Strong road performances in favorite roles
• Defensive lapses at home
• Market still unsure if Detroit is trending up or plateauing
Trust is forming — just not accelerating.
🔍 PVI–SOS System Read
B-Type Road Team vs B-Type Team (Off SU Loss)
Detroit sample:
• SU: 0–0
• ATS: 0–0
• O/U: 0–0
League-wide (Current Season):
• SU: 14–8
• ATS: 17–5
• O/U: 7–15
System Read:
This profile strongly favors ATS structure over SU chaos, with a clear Under bias in comparable league spots.
👉 ATS STATS takeaway: Detroit games in this setup reward discipline, not aggression.
🧱 Situational Identity Snapshot
| Role | Record | GF | GA | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Favorite | 7–8 | 2.67 | 3.73 | Unstable |
| Home Underdog | 7–1 | 3.88 | 2.63 | Strong |
| Road Favorite | 6–2 | 3.50 | 2.13 | Reliable |
| Road Underdog | 4–8 | 2.67 | 3.67 | Vulnerable |
Key Takeaway:
Detroit is far more trustworthy away from home, especially when the market hands them respect.
🔥 Performance Trend Breakdown
| Span | GF | GA | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | Slipping |
| Last 5 | 2.2 | 3.2 | Soft |
| Last 7 | 2.57 | 3.0 | Neutral |
| Last 10 | 2.7 | 2.9 | Balanced |
| Last 15 | 2.93 | 2.6 | Competitive |
This is middle-class hockey — not explosive, not collapsing.
🧠 Key System Trends (ATS STATS Angles)
Professionals are monitoring:
• 13–5 ATS as road underdogs before non-conference games (Total = 6.0)
• Over 8–2 after conference games following a home loss as a favorite
• 8–3 SU after losing previous game by 3+ goals
• 13–4 ATS league-wide in January road spots after home-favorite losses
Trends point to rebound value, especially when Detroit is discounted.
⭐ Betting Value Assessment
Value Rating: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Situational B-Type)
Best Uses:
• Road underdog ATS spots
• Overs in rebound situations
• Structured matchups vs conference opponents
Avoid:
• Blind home favorite plays
• Overreacting to short SU losing streaks
• Paying a premium without matchup confirmation
📝 Final Report Card + Verdict
| Category | Grade | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Market Grade | B | Fair |
| Cycle Strength | B | In transition |
| DMVI | A- | Market lag |
| Situational Edge | B | Role-dependent |
| PVI–SOS | B+ | ATS-friendly |
| Betting Value | B | Selective |
⭐ Final Verdict: HOLD / SELECTIVE BUY
Detroit isn’t a headline team — it’s a situational asset.
Play them when the market hesitates… and step aside when it doesn’t.
Quiet value beats loud hype — and that’s where ATSStats.com investors eat.
